Tear Gas Is Dangerous And Should Be Illegal


 
10.1k
Shares
 

By Ed Cara

Tear gas is a chemical weapon that is banned for use in warfare, yet U.S. police have repeatedly deployed it against people protesting police brutality and anti-black violence this week. Though it’s considered a non-lethal weapon, tear gas is actually far more dangerous than advertised—especially in the midst of a global pandemic.

There are different types of chemicals available as so-called riot-control agents. But the most common ingredient used today in what we call tear gas is 2-chlorobenzylidene malonitrile, or CS. Though also deployed as a spray, the tear gas form of CS is actually a powder that’s aerosolized when the canister or grenade containing it goes off. Like the name implies, the immediate effects of CS exposure include an intense, painful irritation of the eyes that causes crying, spasms, and itching. But the chemical can also affect practically every part of the body that it comes into contact with.

A 2016 scientific review lays out the laundry list of health effects from tear gas. On skin, it can cause redness, itching, rashes, and oozing blisters. When it’s inhaled, the gas causes fits of coughing that can progress to choking and chest tightness. In our eyes, a dose at close range can cause bleeding, tearing of the corneas, and possibly even traumatic nerve damage.

These effects are supposed to be short-lasting and relatively mild, but those assumptions largely come from early animal experiments and small studies involving young, healthy men. As tear gas has become more widely used by police on citizens around the globe over the past few decades, the real-world evidence isn’t so pretty.

For instance, a 2014 study of people living in Turkey—a country with a long history of political instability and protests—found that those who were repeatedly exposed to tear gas were twice as likely to have breathing problems than a control group, and they were also at greater risk of developing chronic bronchitis. (While there’s no research on this yet, it stands to reason that a person injured by tear gas could be more susceptible to covid-19.) Other studies have documented mass chemical burns caused by the explosion of the grenade or a heavy dose, as well as severe eye injuries.

There have also been numerous deaths or permanently debilitating injuries attributed to the use of tear gas. Sometimes, these deaths are caused by the physical impact of grenades launched at close range, with some weapons capable of hurling them at over 200 miles an hour. Other times, as the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention notes, tear gas can cause “immediate death” from severe burns to the throat and lungs.

Pepper spray, the other most common kind of chemical riot-control agent, is also far from harmless. Studies have linked inhaling high doses to “adverse cardiac, respiratory, and neurologic effects, including arrhythmias and sudden death.”

Life-threatening exposures to tear gas and pepper spray are likely most common when they’re used indoors and/or on people with pre-existing respiratory conditions such as asthma. Some police training manuals apparently advise against using tear gas in confined spaces, but a man in Washington D.C. says police shot tear gas into his home on Monday evening, after he invited in protestors who were also being pepper sprayed by police.

According to Dan Kaszeta, a security specialist who has written about the risks of tear gas and other chemical agents in Nature and elsewhere, the unwarranted or unsafe deployment of tear gas by police tends to be the rule, not the exception.

“Tear gas is often used without proper care for consequences of employment. Many of the uses seen in previous days are problematic. Tear gas is originally meant to disperse crowds, but many crowds have legal rights of assembly,” Kaszeta said via email.

The covid-19 pandemic has added another layer of danger to the use of tear gas during protests, according to Peter Chin-Hong, an infectious disease specialist at the University of California San Francisco.

“Suppose somebody has covid-19 and they’re being gassed with tear gas. What’s going to happen? Well, they’re going to be coughing more, they’re going to be spreading all those droplets over the place, they’re going to be shouting with pain. That’s a no-brainer,” Chin-Hong said over the phone. Another more speculative risk is that the mouth and nose irritation caused by tear gas might make uninfected people more susceptible to any respiratory infection, including covid-19, he added.

Sven-Eric Jordt, a Duke University biologist whose team has studied the health risks of tear gas since the early 2000s, is similarly fearful about how tear gas could worsen the pandemic.

“I am shocked about the massive use we are currently seeing, especially in the background of the covid-19 pandemic,” he said, adding that any complications could be even worse for people of color protesting, since they’re already more at risk to catch the illness and might be more likely to develop severe illness.

Chin-Hong helped create an open letter for public health experts to sign and express their solidarity with the protests, which also calls for strategies to lower the risk of covid-19 spread during them. Chief among the recommendations is for police to stop using tear gas. So far, he said, the letter has been signed by over 1,000 people.

Media outlets across the country, as well as numerous social media posts, continue to document the indiscriminate use of tear gas and pepper spray by police against peaceful protestors and journalists, however. In Indiana, for instance, 21-year-old Balin Brake, an editor at a local television station, reportedly lost his left eye after being struck by a tear gas canister during a protest. (Police have denied that the injury was intentional.) Journalists in Minneapolis also reported that police shot at them with tear gas at point-blank range.

Tear gas is famously banned from use in warfare by several international treaties. But government after government has allowed it to be wielded against their own citizens. That this chemical weapon is once again being deployed widely is yet another example of the systemic police brutality that people are protesting in the first place.



 
10.1k
Shares
 

Articles in this issue:

Masthead

  • Masthead

    Editor-in Chief:
    Kirsten Nicole

    Editorial Staff:
    Kirsten Nicole
    Stan Kenyon
    Robyn Bowman
    Kimberly McNabb
    Lisa Gordon
    Stephanie Robinson

    Contributors:
    Kirsten Nicole
    Stan Kenyon
    Liz Di Bernardo
    Cris Lobato
    Elisa Howard
    Susan Cramer

Leave a Comment

Please keep in mind that all comments are moderated. Please do not use a spam keyword or a domain as your name, or else it will be deleted. Let's have a personal and meaningful conversation instead. Thanks for your comments!

Image Captcha