By Dana K. Plank, MS, RN
The nationwide nursing shortage is a well-known issue and a common topic among the leadership of many healthcare organizations. Efforts to address the shortage have been underway for years, from promotional initiatives to encourage recruitment to federal scholarships and loans to support training. States have also launched initiatives, often with the caveat that the nurse must remain in the state to practice where the scholarship was awarded.
Despite these measures, the nursing shortage persists, as does an equally significant and related issue: the decline in the number of available faculty members to teach future nurses. As of 2022-2023, a whopping 8.8% of the nation's full-time nurse faculty positions were vacant.
The American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN) identified the core causes of this faculty shortage. One driver is an aging faculty population who have a limited number of years left to teach prior to retirement. In addition, academic faculty tend to earn less than other nurses -- some nurses have taken up to a $40,000 annual pay cut when leaving clinical practice to enter academia. Many nurses are likely hesitant to accept such a decrease in salary. Another factor is the progressive decline in enrollment in master's and doctoral nursing programs, reducing the number of new nurses trained in education and qualified to teach.
Turning Away Prospective Nursing Students
This faculty shortage has a significant influence on the nursing shortage. In an AACN 2023-2024 report, U.S. nursing programs reported that they were forced to turn away a total of 65,766 applicants, in large part due to insufficient faculty numbers. Further aggravating the problem is the limited number of clinical sites and insufficient classroom and simulation lab space, as well as a lack of funds to support growing nursing programs.
Exploring Solutions
While the nursing shortage is widely recognized, the shortage of nursing faculty receives far less attention. More attention to the problem has compelled policymakers at the federal level to introduce legislation that would establish a pilot program to augment wages for nurse educators and support efforts to recruit and retain faculty. This has been slow to progress, unfortunately.
Meanwhile, some states have initiated programs to increase the number of clinical faculty or preceptors by offering certain incentives for teaching. Texas, Tennessee, and Hawaii have instituted programs such as: tuition exemptions; payment for precepting students in addition to their regular salary; and tax credits.
Could more nurse involvement in policy development help expedite legislative change? While many nurses aren't comfortable getting involved in the political arena, staying informed and becoming active in state and national nursing organizations is a good start. Nursing organizations are powerful advocates for the profession, and when the membership numbers are high, they have a greater influence.
Another intervention is to establish more academic-practice partnerships. These incorporate nursing education programs into a healthcare practice setting, and the two organizations work collaboratively to prepare new nurses for the profession. This simultaneously helps address workforce needs and faculty shortages. It can also foster more clinical experience, cultivate professional growth, and offer guaranteed recruitment pipelines for hospitals. Essentially, it offers a return on investment to all organizations involved, since each is delivering benefits to the other in "human capital," which is converted to financial, operational, and educational value.
It's also time for a shift in the nursing recruitment pipeline. According to a survey conducted in 2022, almost 100,000 registered nurses and 34,000 licensed practical nurses left the nursing profession due to the toll of the COVID-19 pandemic. Recruiters need to take into account demographic shifts in median age, gender, and race in order to attract new nurses. For example, recruiters have begun visiting high schools to generate interest in the profession using shadow work-type programs with their institution.
Finally, certain philanthropic organizations have taken an interest in the issue and have shown support both financially and via advocacy for increased federal funding. This assistance has focused on expanding the number of doctoral-prepared nurses who can serve as faculty.
Supply Versus Demand
The demand for qualified nurses continues to exceed the supply. This shortfall is expected to increase as more nurses retire. To address this, it's essential to increase nurse faculty and grow nursing education programs.
Every year, nursing faculty are being forced to do more with less while we expect them to continue to provide a high-quality nursing education. While the solutions I've offered to the nursing faculty shortage may be perceived as stop-gap measures, it is essential to initiate any or all solutions so that we are able to retain those currently in faculty positions and welcome newcomers. Without these efforts, the nursing faculty shortage will persist within the broader nursing shortage.
Dana K. Plank, MS, RN, is a registered nurse.
Masthead
Editor-in Chief:
Kirsten Nicole
Editorial Staff:
Kirsten Nicole
Stan Kenyon
Robyn Bowman
Kimberly McNabb
Lisa Gordon
Stephanie Robinson
Contributors:
Kirsten Nicole
Stan Kenyon
Liz Di Bernardo
Cris Lobato
Elisa Howard
Susan Cramer
Please keep in mind that all comments are moderated. Please do not use a spam keyword or a domain as your name, or else it will be deleted. Let's have a personal and meaningful conversation instead. Thanks for your comments!
*This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Ryan J Nicolato RN
December 23, 2025 07:21 55Disclaimer: I am a Registered Professional Nurse with an active, unencumbered license and ten years of bedside experience in telemetry-medical-surgical care. The following represents my personal opinion and not that of any employer, organization, or special interest, past or future. I am currently not affiliated with any health system employer or union. These thoughts come from a bedside nurse who values patient care, supports colleagues, and is driven by a desire to understand the challenges in our field. --- We are facing what is widely referred to as a “nursing shortage,†but from the front lines it feels far more like a full-blown crisis than a standard labor issue. I believe we need deeper, more honest exploration into why this shortage exists. Even anecdotal, qualitative observations from bedside nurses—those living the reality—deserve serious attention. While it is true that many nurses are retiring and some move from bedside roles into teaching positions, these explanations only scratch the surface. The reality is that since 2021, very few people who witness the day-to-day demands of bedside nursing would choose it as a long-term career. Most new nurses leave bedside roles within two years, seeking provider positions, staff development, or leadership pathways to escape unsustainable working conditions. Nurses, nurse leaders, and researchers are aware of the core issues but often hesitate to address the systemic flaws driving this crisis. This problem has roots in decades of healthcare evolution—from managed care in the late 1980s to deregulation and the rise of nonprofit and private health systems. Health systems today function less like essential public infrastructure and more like corporate brands, employing MBA-driven strategies for marketing and cost-cutting, often at the expense of patient care. “Caring for the sick†has been reduced to a slogan. Hospitals now operate to benefit boards and executives, focusing on construction projects, glossy new atriums, and advertising campaigns. Much of this is funded by taxpayer dollars, Medicare, and charitable donations—money that could instead ensure safe staffing and better patient care. Even worse, many nonprofit health systems actively lobby against safe staffing regulations, using public funds to delay legislation like the federal Staffing and Quality Care Act. Despite decades of evidence supporting the effectiveness of safe staffing laws, these bills rarely receive meaningful debate. States that have implemented such ratios—like California—have seen remarkable results: improved patient outcomes, higher nurse retention, and sustainable bedside practice. I have personally witnessed the difference. On California units, the workload is challenging but safe, patient satisfaction is high, and nurses have the time to provide proper discharge education that prevents readmissions. Bedside nursing there felt like the profession we were trained for, a stark contrast to the relentless, life-or-death pace I experienced on East Coast units. We need more nurses—academics and clinicians alike—to share observations and contribute to the literature. Our profession occupies a unique space, balancing the intellect of white-collar work with the grit of blue-collar labor. We are in the best position to lead meaningful change in healthcare—but only if we unite and speak honestly. The current system, shaped by financial incentives, is eroding the foundation of acute care. Florence Nightingale believed in structured, disciplined systems focused entirely on saving lives and preserving dignity. I doubt she would recognize how modern nursing has been forced to operate. This is a call to action. What I have seen since the COVID-19 pandemic is unacceptable. Patients deserve dignified, safe care. Nurses deserve environments that allow them to provide it. Without change, both our profession and the acute care system are on the verge of collapse. If you share or challenge these observations, I welcome your perspective. Sincerely, Ryan, RN